Supreme Court Judgments 2022
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2022-11-02 17:33:56
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2022-11-02 17:33:56
by: Admin 2022-06-15 18:50:14
by: Admin 2022-06-15 17:09:55
by: Admin 2022-04-28 20:02:29
by: Admin 2022-04-28 19:00:07
by: Admin 2022-04-28 14:03:30
Supreme Court Judgments 2022
Mohan Breweries & Distilleries V/s Commercial Tax officer, Madras
Kavita Kanwar Vs. Mrs Pamela Mehta & Ors
Parminder Kaur V/s State of Punjab
Central Bank of India V/s M/S Maruti Acetylene Co. Ltd.
Goan Real Estate and Construction Ltd. And Anr. V/s Union of India
Raj Kumar V/s Ajay Kumar
Dr. M. Kocher V/s Ispita Seal
Smt. Seema Kumar V/s Ashwin Kumar
Leo Francis Xaviour V/s The Principal, Karunya Institute
Nazir Mohamed V/s J. Kamala and Ors.
Addissery Raghavan V/s Cheruvalath Krishnadasan
Himalaya House Co. Ltd. Bombay V/s Chief Controlling Revenue
K. Sivaram V/s P. Satishkmar
Basir Ahmed Sisodia V/s The Income Tax Officer
Manish V/s Nidhi Kakkar
Surendra Kumar Bhilawe V/s The New India Assurance Company
D. Velusamy V/s D. Patchaimmal
Life Insurance Corporation of India V/s Mukesh Poonamchand Shah
Neelam Gupta Vs Mahipal Sharan Gupta
Sou. Sandhya Manoj Wankhade V/s Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade
G. Raj Mallaih and Anr. V/s State of Andhra Pradesh
Zee Entertainment Enterprise Ltd. V/s Suresh Production
Chief Administrator of Huda &Anr. v/s Shakuntala Devi
Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprise v/s Ks Infraspace LLP
National Legal Service Authority v/s Union of India and Others
Roxann Sharma V/s Arun Sharma
Ganesh Santa Ram Sirur V/s State Bank of India &Anr.
M/s M.M.T.C Ltd. & Anr v/s M/s Medchl Chemical & Pharma P
Shailendra Swarup V/s Enforcement Directorate, The Deputy
SunitaTokas v/s New India Insurance Ltd.
Triloki Nath Singh V/s Anirudh Singh
Milmet Oftho & Ors. V/s Allergan Inc.
Director of Income Tax II (International Taxation) V/s M/s Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.
M/s ExL Careers V/s Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Ltd V/s Babulal Lade & Ors.
State of Himachal Pradesh V/s A parent of a student of a Medical College & Ors.
Rathnamma & Ors. V/s Sujathamma & Ors.
Ravinder Kaur Grewal V/s Manjit Kaur
Ficus Pax Pvt. Ltd. V/s Union of Indian & Ors.
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s Chandra Sekhar
Judgment: Indian Bank V/s Abs Marine Product Pvt. Ltd.
Kailas & Ors. V/s State of Maharashtra
Sukhedu Das Vs Rita Mukherjee
National Insurance Co. Ltd V/s Hindustan Safety Glass Works
Mahalakshmi V/s Bala Venkatram (d) through LR & Anr.
Kajal V/s Jagdish Chand
Shyamal Kumar V/s Sushil Kumar Agarwal
Megha Khandelwal V/s Rajat Khandelwal and Ors.
Md. Eqbal & Anrs. V/s State of Jharkhand
A. Jayachandra V/s Aneelkaur
Union of India V/s N. K. Shrivasta
Satvinder Singh V/s State of Bihar
Shreya Singhal V/s Union of India
Shaleen Kabra V/s Shiwani Kabra
Vasant Kumar V/s Vijaykumari
United Commercial Bank & Anr. V/s Deepak Debbarma & others
Vinay Kumar Mittal & Others V/s Deewan Housing Financial Corporation Limited
Mohammed Siddique Vs National Insurance Company Ltd
Top 2019 judgements by Supreme Court
Facts of the Case
This appeal has been filed before the Honorable Supreme Court pursuing to the order passed by the Honorable High Court pleading reconsidering the compensation ordered.
Kajal a school going girl had a healthy lifestyle, she would enjoy playing with her friends, her schooling and other normal routine activities. The scenario changed after 18/10/2007, where Kajal was travelling with her parent on tractor, a truck driver driving the vehicle rashly ran into tractor rupturing the whole vehicle also causing serious injuries to the father and the mother of the appellant. The appellant kajal suffered more grievous injuries resulting into a complete turnover of her life. Kajal suffered a serious brain-damaging injury apart from other injuries which lead to serious disability. After a thorough examination of her body and brain Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh for assessing her disability, it was found that the reported head injury has left kajal with a very low I.Q. Doctors from the institute while in detailed report mentioned that her I.Q is less than 20% of any other normal person of the same age. This report concludes that even when the growth of her entire body and organs her brain will remain like a brain of 9 months old child.
Issues of the Case
Judgment
After a thorough proceeding in the case and after analyzing the argument made by the learned counsels it can be said that the accident here has not just devastating or damaging one but it had really caused an irreparable loss the family and most importantly to girl, here a girl with such injury will not be able to survive the life that was gifted to her by nature. The court finds it difficult to even consider any sum of money that will by any way uplift the growth of the girl but at the same time some compensation according to the law should be determined. The Court finds itself in great difficulty in considering what all factors are required to consider before determining the compensation but after all the arguments though not exhaustive will include factors like Loss of earning, loss of future earning, attendant charges, pain, suffering, loss of amenities, loss of marriage prospects, future medical treatment and expenses relating to treatment, hospitalization and transportation. The Honorable Court decides to take all this consideration and increase the compensation from 14, 70,000/- to 62,27,000/- that should be deposited before the Motor Accidental Tribunal. This amount should be kept in fixed deposit for a period of 5 years in a nationalized bank also insurance company can reduce the sum of money if any paid by before this order. The highest interest rate should be paid on the deposited amount pursuing to interest rate rules, the interest received should be paid the parents of the appellant on the quarterly basis.
The amount in compensation should be used for alone the child and other helped needed for the child only. If after the period of 5 years the disability continues or any situation that needs the Trial Court to renew the amount such court with the terms mentioned can do so without any prior approval of the court with rationale. Further, the parents of the appellant are at time in need of money for special medical expense accrued for the appellant should in writing or by any other means make an application to the Trial Court and Trial Court with all due consideration to the application should release so much of amount if it thinks fit.
The Honorable Supreme Court believes the above order to be in the right interest of the appellant. All the appeals further stand disposed with any order to cost, further, if any applications are pending should stand disposed.
Case No.: CA 735 of 2020
Date: 5/02/2020
Comment
Share