Home Speak to a lawyer Meet a lawyer Flat fee services About Blog Judgements Careers Contact Us Snippet Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Legal Topics
Snippet Details

Supreme Court : Notice issued in plea challenging AIBE Rules

  • Date: 2021-01-21 12:18:35
  • Views: 21

A petition was filed by a newly enrolled advocate challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 framed by the Bar Council of India which mandate that an advocate has to qualify the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrolment.

The Petitioner Parthsarthi Mahesh Saraf, who enrolled in 2019, questions the authority of the BCI to prescribe such a post-enrollment requirement for practice. The petitioner also challenges the notification issued by the BCI on December 21, 2020 regarding the holding of AIBE 2021 on January 24 and March 13. The petitioner points out that the issue whether the Bar Council of India has the power to prescribe qualification of a pre-enrollment or post-enrollment exam as a condition to practice has been referred to the Constitution Bench by a three judge bench on March 18, 2016(SLP(c) 22337/2008). The reference is still pending.

The petitioner argues that the AIBE Rules 2010 are against the dictum in the below cited precedents.

The petition filed through Advocate V K Biju states that in the case V Sudheer vs BCI and another 1999(3) SCC 176, the Supreme Court had quashed the Bar Council Training Rues 1995 holding that BCI cannot impose additional conditions for advocates by way of subordinate rules contravening the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.

In another decision of the Supreme Court, in the case of Indian Council of Legal Aid and Advice vs BCI reported in 1995 SCC (1) 732, it was held that BCI cannot make any rules under Section 49(1)(ag) of the Advocates Act, 1961, debarring the advocates on the basis of age and such rule is beyond the rule making power and therefore the same is ultra vires the Advocates Act and also against the public policy.

The petitioner also challenges the 1973 amendment to the Advocates Act which omitted Section 24(1)(d). The petition states that a Bar Examination is a pre-condition for admission to the Bar in most commonwealth countries, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore, South Africa as well as the United Kingdom. It is also stated that in India the relevant Statutes/ Acts pertaining to the professional courses like MBBS, CA, CS, BAMS, BHMS etc. prescribe a mandatory training and examination before enrollment on the rolls/registers of the respective professional Institutes/Councils. In this backdrop, the statutory amendment which omitted such condition from the Advocates Act in 1973 is also challenged as "arbitrary and unreasonable".

The petitioner highlights that the reports of the High Powered Committee constituted by the Supreme Court in 2009 has recommended training an examination before enrollment to improve the standards of legal profession. However, ignoring such recommendations, and also violating the Supreme Court judgments, the BCI has introduced a post-enrollment exam, says the petitioner.

In view of the above, the Supreme Court issues notice on Petition challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 framed by the Bar Council of India which mandate that an advocate has to qualify the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrolment.



More like this



SC to consider PIL to include Legal field in the Covid-19 vaccination priority list

2021-02-16

On Tuesday, the SC agreed to hear a PIL for the addition of judges, lawyers and court staff to be included in the priority list for Covid-19 vaccination.

SC to consider PIL to include Legal field in the Covid-19 vaccination priority list

DNA Technology Regulation Bill, 2019.

2021-02-12

The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019, aims to establish the identity of victims, offenders, undertrials, missing people, unknown dead people, suspects and undertrials. It proposes a DNA Regulatory Board to address concerns a

DNA Technology Regulation Bill, 2019.

HC discusses the invocation of arbitration clause if one party appoints arbitrator on 'ex-parte' basis.

2021-02-10

Justice Kameswar Rao will decide a petition wherein, on the arbitration clause' invocation, one of the parties appointed the sole arbitrator and did not receive confirmation from the other party.

HC discusses the invocation of arbitration clause if one party appoints arbitrator on 'ex-parte' basis.

Comedian Munawar Faruqui granted bail; SC says ‘FIR Vague.’

2021-02-08

On Friday, the SC granted bail to stand-up comedian Munawar Faruqui, stating that the procedure of the notice before his arrest was not followed correctly. The SC believed that the FIR was vague.

Comedian Munawar Faruqui granted bail; SC says ‘FIR Vague.’

Cryptocurrency Ban: India plans to introduce new law prohibiting all 'Private Cryptocurrencies.'

2021-02-04

The government at the Centre is planning to introduce a new law banning all private cryptocurrencies. However, the new law will allow certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of cryptocurrency and its uses.

Cryptocurrency Ban: India plans to introduce new law prohibiting all 'Private Cryptocurrencies.'

SC stays Bombay HC Judgement of the interpretation of 'Sexual Assault' under the POCSO Act.

2021-02-01

The SC stayed the acquittal of the accused, wherein it was held that pressing of a minor girl's breasts without disrobing does not amount to "sexual assault" within the meaning of Section 8 of POCSO Act. Meanwhile, the NCPCR has asked the Maharashtra

SC stays Bombay HC Judgement of the interpretation of 'Sexual Assault' under the POCSO Act.

SC drops UP Govt's plea to stop HC from examining Love-Jihad Laws

2021-01-28

On Monday, the SC dismissed the UP government's plea seeking to prevent the Allahabad HC from investigating the state's controversial anti-conversion law and that no constitutional court should be "lightly" pursued.

SC drops UP Govt's plea to stop HC from examining Love-Jihad Laws

SC drops policy of excluding the reserved community from competing

2021-01-27

Under Article 32, two female nominees from reserved groups approached the SC opposing the appointment process undertaken in 2013 to fill the vacancies of constables in the UP Police. The SC dropped the policy that excluded the reserved community from

SC drops policy of excluding the reserved community from competing

Will non-payment of stamp duty, hold the contract's arbitration clause invalid?

2021-01-25

The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court has determined that non-payment of the stamp duty on a commercial contract will not invalidate the arbitration provision which forms part of that contract.

Will non-payment of stamp duty, hold the contract's arbitration clause invalid?

Supreme Court: Committee will proceed with or without protesting farmers.

2021-01-22

The Supreme Court stated that the panel members are the agricultural fields' brilliant minds, and no one is pressuring the farmers to come before the Committee against their will. The court said that Committee would move ahead with or without the pre

Supreme Court: Committee will proceed with or without protesting farmers.

Petitions filed by scholars against MPPSC dismissed by Madhya Pradesh HC.

2021-01-22

Madhya Pradesh HC dismissed the petitions of former scholars aspiring to become assistant professors and observed that petitioners had made a mistake while filling the form, hence they cannot be given the benefit of extra points.

Petitions filed by scholars against MPPSC dismissed by Madhya Pradesh HC.

SC Issues Notice on PILs For Uniform Law.

2021-01-22

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court (SC) including CJI SA Bobde, J. AS Bopanna and J. V Ramasubramanian issued a notice on two Public Interest Litigations looking for consistency in the personal laws regulating divorce, maintenance and alimony f

SC Issues Notice on PILs For Uniform Law.

Supreme Court rejects Aadhaar review plea in 4:1 verdict.

2021-01-22

The Supreme Court on Wednesday, by a majority vote of 4:1, rejected a collection of petitions demanding a reversal of its 2018 judgement, which established the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar flagship scheme of the Centre.

Supreme Court rejects Aadhaar review plea in 4:1 verdict.

Protection granted to the creators of

2021-01-22

Bombay High Court issued anticipatory transit bail for three weeks to the Taandav series director, producer and authors, Amazon Prime India.

Protection granted to the creators of "Tandav" series.

Delhi HC awarded 10 lakh compensation for negligence of BSES

2021-01-21

The Delhi HC awarded 10 lakh compensation to the family of deceased for the negligence by BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. in maintaining electric wires in a Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Delhi HC awarded 10 lakh compensation for negligence of BSES

Supreme Court : Notice issued in plea challenging AIBE Rules

2021-01-21

The Supreme Court issues notice in a Petition filed by a newly enrolled advocate challenging the AIBE Rules 2010 which mandates that an Advocate has to qualify the AIBE to practice law after enrolment.

Supreme Court : Notice issued in plea challenging AIBE Rules

Cyber data privacy in peril

2021-01-21

The recent controversy triggered by WhatsApp's move to unilaterally amend its privacy policy appears to have acted as a catalyst to shake Indian citizens out of complacency. Hopefully, the government comes up with an effective mechanism to deal with

Cyber data privacy in peril

SC: One-sided and unreasonable clauses constitutes an unfair trade practice.

2021-01-14

SC held that Developer cannot compel the buyers to be bound by the one-sided contractual terms in the Agreement as it is in violation of the Consumer Protection Act.

SC: One-sided and unreasonable clauses constitutes an unfair trade practice.

Allahabad HC: Compulsory Publication of Notice Under Sec 6 of Special Marriage Act is violative of Right to Privacy

2021-01-14

The Allahabad High Court has directed that while giving notice under Sec 5 of the Special Marriage Act, it shall be optional for the parties to make a request in writing to publish or not to publish a notice under Sec 6 of the Act.

Allahabad HC: Compulsory Publication of Notice Under Sec 6 of Special Marriage Act is violative of Right to Privacy

SC: An accused released on default bail cannot be re-arrested.

2021-01-11

In an appeal, the SC held that an accused released on default bail cannot be re-arrested on filing of charge-sheet by the police.

SC: An accused released on default bail cannot be re-arrested.

SC: Legal rights of Parties cannot be thrown away

2021-01-11

While allowing the appeal arising out of Motor Accident Compensation Claim filed by heirs of a deceased couple, the SC observed that Advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law.

SC: Legal rights of Parties cannot be thrown away

Happy Clients

Let us assist you in taking care of all your legal worries and immune you from legal risks.