+91 7738 0716 11
+91 7738 0716 11Remedies against harassment by Recovery Agents
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2021-02-18 07:12:13
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2021-02-18 07:12:13
by: admin 2021-02-12 07:34:18
by: Admin 2021-02-04 07:13:42
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2021-02-03 11:47:51
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2021-01-25 14:10:26
by: Adv. Kishan Dutt Kalaskar 2021-01-14 12:43:56
Remedies against harassment by Recovery Agents
Abetment to Suicide
Overview of the Vehicle Scrappage Policy
Rights of husbands in dowry and cruelty-based complaints
Admissibility of E-evidence; Are WhatsApp chats and E-mails admissible in Court?
Triloki Nath Singh V/s Anirudh Singh
Milmet Oftho & Ors. V/s Allergan Inc.
Director of Income Tax II (International Taxation) V/s M/s Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.
M/s ExL Careers V/s Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Ltd V/s Babulal Lade & Ors.
Constitutionality of Bandhs
State of Himachal Pradesh V/s A parent of a student of a Medical College & Ors.
Rathnamma & Ors. V/s Sujathamma & Ors.
Ravinder Kaur Grewal V/s Manjit Kaur
Ficus Pax Pvt. Ltd. V/s Union of Indian & Ors.
Commissioner of Income Tax V/s Chandra Sekhar
Analysis of Section 41-A of CRPC, 1973
Judgment: Indian Bank V/s Abs Marine Product Pvt. Ltd.
Kailas & Ors. V/s State of Maharashtra
Sukhedu Das Vs Rita Mukherjee
Witness to a Will
National Insurance Co. Ltd V/s Hindustan Safety Glass Works
Mahalakshmi V/s Bala Venkatram (d) through LR & Anr.
Kajal V/s Jagdish Chand
Shyamal Kumar V/s Sushil Kumar Agarwal
NRI's Power of Attorney
Megha Khandelwal V/s Rajat Khandelwal and Ors.
Is Registration Compulsory under Trademark and Copyright?
Md. Eqbal & Anrs. V/s State of Jharkhand
Types of Will
Employment Contract
Police Clearance Certificate
Validity of Crypto-Currency in India
A. Jayachandra V/s Aneelkaur
Points to be considered before filing an Income Tax Return
Union of India V/s N. K. Shrivasta
Startup under the Government Programme
The procedure for filing a complaint against a Lawyer
Types of Stamp Paper
Satvinder Singh V/s State of Bihar
Sexual Violence laws under the Indian Penal Code
Shreya Singhal V/s Union of India
Division of Assets
Shaleen Kabra V/s Shiwani Kabra
Types of Property
Vasant Kumar V/s Vijaykumari
Personal Injury - Damages
Adultery under the Indian Law
United Commercial Bank & Anr. V/s Deepak Debbarma & others
Intentional Wrongs
Vinay Kumar Mittal & Others V/s Deewan Housing Financial Corporation Limited
How to get a Marriage Certificate?
Mohammed Siddique Vs National Insurance Company Ltd
Pagdi System
The Bonus Act
Frivolous Complaints under the Sexual Harassment Act
Important Income Tax Return Forms and its Due Dates
Garden Leave
How can a Private Complaint be filed?
Key changes to Indian Tax Regulations
Employees Provident Fund
Status of Triple Talaq
Contract Farming & the new ordinances that affect the Farmers
Documents required for filing a Divorce
Section 138, 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881
Validity and Enforceability of Click-wrap Agreements
Child Custody under Christian and Parsi Law
Hindu Succession Act
Oppression and Mismanagement
Fraudulent and Invalid Contracts
Developments in Reserve Bank of India
Loan Frauds in India
Penalties associated with Driving
Laws governing a Knife
Medical Negligence and its Compensation
Interim Maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act
Shortcomings of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
Tougher rules for the E-Commerce Industry
Difficulties faced by men in Family Courts
The consumer is the King in 2020
Illegal Termination of an Employee during Covid-19.
Child Labour Laws in times of Covid-19
Real Estate scenario Post Covid-19
Post Covid-19 Digital Shift of Legal practise
Mutual Consent Divorce through Video Conferencing
59 Chinese Apps banned in India
Litigants and the Lockdown - A Court Perspective
Anticipatory Bail for cases under section 498A of IPC
Brand Protection in times of Covid-19
Title Verification of Immovable Property
The Judiciary during the Pandemic
Termination of an Employee during Covid-19
Drafting of a Will
Criminal Medical Negligence in times of Covid-19
How does Covid-19 affect employers and employees?
Rent deference during the Pandemic
Post Covid-19 digital shift of legal practise
Police Interrogation
Prenuptial Agreements
Void and Voidable Contracts
The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881
Cheque Bounce Notice
Types of Dishonour of Cheques
Intestate Succession
The Stand of Essential Commodities
Trademark Cease and Desist Notice
IT Department Notice
Eviction of a Tenant
Consumer Complaint Legal Notice
Medical Adherence to Environmental Laws
Basic Elements of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Debt Recovery Notice
Cheque Bounce Notice
Hygiene maintenance in Hospitals and Clinics
Consequences of using a Fake Degree/Certificate
Healthcare Security
Rights of Doctors with respect to Medical Negligence
Importance of Consent
Faulty Machine Aids Medical Negligence
The Special Marriage Act, 1954
Top 2019 judgements by Supreme Court
National Medical Commission Act 2019
Money Laundering
Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)
Child Labour
Endorsement under Negotiable Instrument Act
Quashing of an FIR
Annulment of Marriage
Probate
FAQ's on Trademark
EMI - Equated Monthly Installments
Legal mistakes made by the Start-Up
What is a Stamp Paper?
Sexual Abuse in Shelter Homes
Debt Recovery provisions under the SARFAESI Act
Effective ways to stop Ragging
Transfer of Property Act
Personal Injury Lawyers
Marriage Registration under the Special Marriage Act
Rights of Tenant
Classification of various Collar Jobs
Documents to be submitted for ITR Filing
Illegal Immigrants
Role of lawyers in Corporate Finance
Intestate Succession
Employment of White Collar Employment of White Collar
Domestic Violence
Power of Attorney
Dissolution of Marriage - Christian
Noting And Protest
Hostile Witness
Unfair Trade Practice
All you need to know: Drafting a Legal Notice
Fraudulent and unauthorized transactions at ATM
Is legal documentation important in medical practice?
Why do doctors need to be updated with medical negligence laws?
Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
Jurisdiction of Consumer Redressal Forums
Does telephonic consultations amount to culpable negligence?
Consumer dispute Redressal Forum in dealing with Medical Negligence
Validity of Notices.
Response to a Legal Notice
Promotion of Medical Products.
Doctors' Bill: Prohibition of Violence & Damage to Property Bill, 2019.
Why less Indemnity cover is risky for Doctors?
Procedure for filing a Notice in India
Format of Legal Notices in India
Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019
Demerger
Legal framework for the Elimination of violence against Women in India
International Day for the Elimination of violence against Women
Family Courts in India
Inheritance Law in India
Rights of Children in India
Virtual Clinic
New Medical Technologies in India
Land Records & Titles
Regulations for firecrackers during Diwali
Legal and Regulatory Regime: Medical Technology
Intellectual Property in Medicine
Consumer Protection Bill, 2019
Artificial Intelligence in healthcare
The Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act
Warrant and its Types
Joint Custody of Child in India
Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
Penal Provision on Rash and Negligent Driving
National Company Law Tribunal
Rules to be followed by the Ganpati Mandals
Need to amend CrPC and IPC to increase the conviction rate.
Motor Vehicle Amendment Act, 2019
The Growth of technology Patents in India
Citizenship under the Indian Constitution
Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution
A comparative study of the Indian, UK and the US Constitution
Can the Indian Constitution be Amended?
Overview of the Indian Constitution
All you need to know: Drafting a Legal Notice
Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019
Overview of The Indian Penal Code
Offences and Prosecution under the Income Tax Act, 1961
The abolishment of Article 370 of the Constitution: One Nation One Flag
Intervention of SC in the Unnao Rape Case
Case of abandoned NRI brides, Supreme Court issues notice to the State
Financial Risk Management
Know more about Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
Procedure to File Complain against Domestic Violence
The IndiGo Promotors Feud
Rajya Sabha passes the Triple Talaq Bill
Gift Deed
More about Contested Divorce
Things to be kept in mind - Dishonor of Cheque
Prison Reforms in India
Consumer Protection ACT, 1986
More about Joint Venture
Delay of Condonation
Points to be Noted for Child Custody to Father
Basic information of Companies
Plastic Money and their Advantage & Disadvantages
Motor Accident Claim Tribunal
Guidelines to protect doctors from frivolous and unjust prosecution
Unjust Compensation - A Doctors Perspective
Misdiagnosis: A Medical Negligence?
Exemption of doctors operating in Emergency Rooms
General Types of Medico-Legal Cases (MLC)
Duty of patient to avoid aiding Medical Negligence
Rights of the Patient
Steps to be taken to avoid Medical Negligence
Liability of Medical Negligence under Consumer Protection Act
Laws that affect Medical Professionals in India
Defense against Medical Negligence Cases
Duties of Doctors
Common types of Medical Negligence
Medical Consent for treatment in India
Regulation for E - Pharmacy in India
Types of Consent for Medical Treatment
Guidelines for Autopsy/ Postmortem in India
Guidelines for the prescription of medicines
Procedure to start a Pharmacy Store in India
India Vs Pakistan: Kulbhushan Jadhav's Case
Contempt of Court
Juvenile Justice Act, 2000
Bankruptcy & Insolvency in India
The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
Guardian and Ward Act In India
Medical Negligence in India
Procedure to be followed in Civil Recovery Proceedings
Rights of Consumers
Mandatory Registration of Documents and procedure
Rafale Deal And All About The Controversy
By: Admin
Date:26 October 2020
Accidents
Comments:0
Views:95
Likes:0Mohammed Siddique Vs National Insurance Company Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Case No. - 79/2020
Facts of the case
Appellant’s 23-year-old son died on 7th September 2008 as result of certain injuries, that emerged two days after the accident took place, the victim was a motorcycle rider who was thrown out of his vehicle when the car hit the motorcycle from behind. Thus, the motor accident claim tribunal held that the accident was caused to the rash and negligent act of the person who was driving the car.
The tribunal awarded appellant compensation of RS. 11,66,800/-
Therefore, upon being aggrieved by the order passed by the tribunal, the insurance company filed a complaint in the high court under section 173 of the motor vehicles act 1988. The high court made a remark that the victim was also guilty of contributory negligence equally as the other three people in the motor vehicle were responsible when the accident took place. Therefore, a judgement was given by the high court of reducing the compensation to 10% that awarded before by motor tribunal. The high court also revised and restructured the compensation amount to RS.4,60,000/- after reducing the 10% due to contributory negligence and the last compensation that was given RS. 4,14,000/-.
Therefore, the high court interfered with the decision that was given by the tribunal taking into consideration three important points they are-
It was seen by the material record and other facts of the case the accident had occurred at around 2:00 PM, and it was concluded that there was no possibility of heavy road traffic during that hour. The facts that were found by the tribunal was confirmed by the high court, and it was clear that while the deceased was travelling, and he was hit by a car from behind. Hence, this was seen as a clear case of rash and negligent driving on the part of the car driver. However, the court further added that it also holds the other three persons responsible and that they could have added to the imbalance that was caused at the time when the accident took place. Thus, upon scrutiny and assessing the evidence the high court had found substantial matter in the petition which was taken up by the national insurance company in the above matter while taking into consideration the points and other facts that were laid down by the respondent as well.
Being unhappy with the decision and the compensation that was given by the high court, the appellant approached the Supreme Court for further appeal.
The supreme court noted that high court had reversed the judgement that was given by the motor claim tribunal with regards to the monthly salary and employment relating to the insurance company and on the ground of substantial evidence. The Supreme Court also pointed out that the tribunal recorded all the facts and existed, and excluded the statement of the employers of the insurance company. The Apex court also observed that the high court had applied the rules taking into consideration the case of UPSRTC Vs Trilok Chandra, which had approved the decision of the manager.
Another issue was about as to how the order and findings of the tribunal were reversed by the high court and turned the direction of the case to the employment and the monthly income of the deceased, which he earned. And as of this, the employer did not produce any records or other statements that were required to assess the salary and income of the deceased. A reference was made to that amount, and accordingly, the court has fixed the income of the deceased at the time of the accident took place.
Issue of the case
Does a violation of the law under the motor vehicles act Ipso Facto lead to the conclusion of contributory negligence by the petitioner?
Judgement
The Supreme Court has stated that even if the deceased victim was riding along with other riders, it may not give a add towards contributory negligence under this case.
It was also held that the multiplier should be used with reference to the age of the deceased. Under this case, a dispute can always be raised with respect to the age, as a cause of that has to be taken into consideration, a reference was taken by the three bench judge in Munna Lal Jain case, where the bench observed that the multiplier must depend on the exact age of the defendants in a particular case.
In the light of the above observation, it was clearly seen the high court had left no room for revisiting the confusion that was caused by the court in the conflict between Trilok Chandra on the one hand on the other this later decision laid down by the court.
In this case, it might be true that due to this accident, it may leave a 90-year-old mother dependent. Therefore, binding this court amid the nature of this case.
The court also held that if where any other evidence had not been shown to prove that the wrongful act of the deceased victim contributed either to the accident or to the nature of injuries that were sustained. Therefore, the victim could not be held guilty of contributory negligence. The reduction that was given in terms of compensation completely stands unjustified, and the court has decided to set the decision of the high court aside.
Thus, the Supreme Court has stated that the High court has committed a grave error in laying down this decision.
While holding the victim guilty of contributory negligence, rejecting the evidence that was laid down about the employment and the monthly income of the deceased, and thus, applying the multiplier of 14 instead of 18. Thus, this appeal was allowed, and the impugned order of the high court was completely set aside by the apex court. Therefore, the court reinstated the judgment that was given by the tribunal and stated that there shall be no order as to any costs.
Comment
Share